[Before I start, 
                    you might like to look up “gyroscope” 
                    in Wikipedia] 
                  Test flying and trimming of the “Heart of Gold” 
                    F2B flying wing stunter has advanced to the point where the 
                    model could be flown in a contest. It has been flown with 
                    ST35C, STG21/40, STG21/46, Enya 45 6001 and Enya 45 6002 engines. 
                    The lightest engine, the ST35C was flown with the engine as 
                    far forward as permitted by the engine mounts, but still tail 
                    heavy. Turns were extremely tight! 
                  A problem appeared during outside squares. The model wanted 
                    to yaw in and float on the lines: not good! Peter White suggested 
                    this may be a problem related to the gyroscopic effect of 
                    the propeller, a problem previously corrected by Al Rabe, 
                    using a movable rudder. Hmm, sounded good, but my model has 
                    no fin or rudder! 
                  I was puzzled that the gyroscopic yaw problem was so bad 
                    on the “Heart of Gold”. The lack of a fuselage 
                    and fin possibly meant that there was little in the way of 
                    yaw damping: that, plus the low moment of inertia, seemed 
                    to make the flying wing model more susceptible to this problem. 
                    But what to do about it? 
                  First I reviewed the little I know about gyroscopes. Back 
                    in an early Zaic Yearbook (Model Aeronautic Year Book, by 
                    Frank Zaic,1951-52: also Model Airplane News, April, 1950, 
                    by Don Foote) there were diagrams of the effect of forces 
                    on gyroscopes, so I drew on that for my own movable rudder 
                    on my first “Rivets” F2B, back in 1968. The first 
                    thing to realise is that gyroscopes are weird. When you push 
                    on them, they don’t just tilt over in the direction 
                    you push them! Rather they tilt over somewhere else, which 
                    is rather unnerving! The reaction force takes place 90 degrees 
                    later in the direction of rotation, which takes some getting 
                    used to. 
                  For example, on a model, down elevator produces a reaction 
                    force that makes the model want to yaw in: up elevator makes 
                    the model want to yaw out. High RPM and heavy props make the 
                    reaction force stronger. This seemed to be what I observed 
                    on the “Heart of Gold”, so it was apparent that 
                    the elevator was causing the problem. Well, I could hardly 
                    leave the elevator off: having no flaps or fins to start with, 
                    this could become an uninspiring model! 
                  Being a proof-of-concept model, I have no hesitation in cutting 
                    pieces off it to correct a problem, so the logical thing to 
                    attack with the knife was the trouble-causing elevator. My 
                    first thought was to yaw the elevator hinge line. By moving 
                    the port side of the elevator forward, that would induce a 
                    yawing force, out on down and in on up. (you gotta fly stunt 
                    to follow that mish-mash) (hey, my spell-checker thinks “gotta” 
                    is a real word!). 
                  I ran this idea past Peter. Hmm, could work. But a week later 
                    I was in Sydney for the wedding of Stumax, with a chance to 
                    drop in on mountain-man Andrew Heath. I ran the idea past 
                    him, and was amazed to discover the Russian F2D guys were 
                    already doing this: nothing new under the sun there. Then 
                    I considered tilting the whole elevator: this would do the 
                    job too. But both methods required rather more hacking than 
                    my lazy mind could handle. I needed something easy, you now, 
                    just one slash and the job done! 
                  Then it came to me: bend the port elevator down. One slash, 
                    some epoxy left over from making a prop and the job done! 
                    I guessed the angle, slashed and glued, then next morning 
                    off to the field. Not so much a “Rabe Rudder”, 
                    more a “Supercool Slash”. Honour and Advancement, 
                    here I come! 
                    
                  After a week of high heat, wind and humidity, the day dawned 
                    cool, calm and overcast: no blinding sun. Perfect for testing. 
                    The mighty Enya 45 6002 purred into life first flick, and 
                    off we went, roo poo flying everywhere. Damn, wish there was 
                    some wind; I’m flying into my own turbulence. Now for 
                    the outside squares. Yes, yaw cured! I’m definitely 
                    a genius! Think I’ll tell Ricky Ponting how to bat! 
                    I even felt like hugging Shane Warne! How sick is that! 
                  Now you will notice I have been circumspect in my language 
                    re assigning this problem to gyroscopic precession. There 
                    is another effect which behaves in the opposite way, the so-called 
                    “P” effect. Up-elevator pitches the nose up, with 
                    the result that the prop blade on the inner disc gets to a 
                    higher angle of attack, while the inner blade gets an increased 
                    angle of attack. The net result is yaw in on up, yaw out on 
                    down. If you are lucky, the “P” effect can cancel 
                    the gyroscopic precession.  
                  I have noticed that during an outside square turn, the model 
                    first yaws out, then back in rather more strongly. It is as 
                    though the “P” effect operates first, then followed 
                    by the reverse gyroscopic effect. More work is needed here. 
                   
                   |